Question: Examine the arguments for and against the claim that globali…
페이지 정보
작성일 23-02-06 10:09
본문
Download : Question Examine the.doc
레포트 > 사회과학계열
영문 대학원 에세이 국제 관계 국제 정치와 경제 세계화 빈부격차 World Bank IMF
Wade, R. and Wolf, M. (2002) Are global poverty and inequality getting worse? Prospect 72: 16-21
런던대학교 대학원 국제관계 석사 과정시 작성하여 제출한 중간 보고서입니다.
UNCTAD, 2001b Improving market access for least developed countries. UNCTAD/DITC/TNCD/4. Geneva, Switzerland, May 2001.
Giddens, A. (1991) The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity
런던대학교 대학원 국제관계 석사 과정시 작성하여 제출한 중간 보고서입니다.
Held, D. and McGrew A. (2007) Globalization/Anti-Globalization, Polity
설명
세계화가 가난한 국가에 좋은 것인가에 대해 연구조사한 에세이입니다. 세계화가 가난한 국가에 좋은 것인가에 대해 연구조사한 에세이입니다.
다. 우선 세계화에 대한 정의를 내리려고 시도했으며 빈국의 입장에서 세계화 찬반에 대해 논의를 했습니다. Jomo K.S. And S. Nagaraj eds. (2001) Globalization versus Development Palgrave
Bibliography
Wolf, M. (2002) Countries still rule the world. Financial Times, 6 Feb.
Bourguignon, F. and Morrisson (2002) Inequality among world citizens, 1820-1992. American Economic Review 4. Sep. : 727-44
UNCTAD, 2002b World Investment Report 2002, Geneva: UNCTAD
순서
Question: Examine the arguments for and against the claim that globalisation is good for the poor.
UNDP 2006 Human Development Report 2006, New York: UN Development Programme
Download : Question Examine the.doc( 20 )
Kiely, R. (2005) Empire in the Age of Globalisation, Pluto, ch.5
1990s?” Review of Income and Wealth, XLVII (2001), 283–300.
Held, David, (2004) Global covenant: The social democratic alternative to the Washington Consensus , MA: Polity press
Winters (2002) `Trade Liberalisation and Poverty: What are the Links?`, The World Economy 25(9): 1339-67
Milanvoic B. (2003) ` The Two Faces of Globalization: Against Globalization as we Know it`, World Development 31(4)
UNDP 1999 Globalization with a Human Face: UN Human Development Report 1999. New York: Oxford University Press and UN Development Programme
Wade, R. and Wolf, M. (2003) `Are global poverty and inequality getting worse?`, in Held. D and McGrew A. eds. The Global Transformations Reader, Polity
UNDP 1997 Human Development Report 1997, New York: Oxford University Press and UN Development Programme
Wade R. (2008) `Globalization, Growth, Poverty, Inequality, Resentment, and Imperialism` in J. Ravenhill (ed.) Global political Economy, Oxford University Press
Dicken, P. (2007) Global Shift Sage, chs 2, 15-17
Pollin, R. (2003) Contours of Descent Verso, ch.5
The dominant view of globalisation is that it is good for everyone. Globalists such as Financial Times` Wolf, World Bank economists Dollar and Kraay claim that globalisation has reduced poverty and inequality and has promoted economic growth across the globe. Meanwhile, among many critics of globalisation, Wade argues that the dominant view ignores negative effects of globalisation and it relies on arbitrary data from the World Bank and the IMF. Along with the debate about the benefits of globalisation for the poor, there are also many ongoing discussions as to whether globalisation is a process or a theory, and it is a new or an old concept.
Gilpin,R. (2000) The challenge of global capitalism: The world economy in the 21st century, Princeton University Press, introduction & ch.1
Kiely, R. (2007) The new political economy of development, Palgrave, ch.7
Chen, Shaoua, and Martin Ravallion, “How Did the World’s Poorest Fare in the
Word Bank (2002b) `Global Economic prospects and Developing Countries – making Trade Work for the Poor`, Washington, DC: World Bank
Therefore, the definition of globalisation needs to be clarified for this essay before starting to examine the pros and cons of globalisation for the poor. The most well known definition of globalisation may be `the intensification of worldwide social relations which link distant localities in such a way that local happenings are shaped by events occurring many miles away and vice versa` (Giddens, 1991: 64 – cited in Kiely, 2007: 77). In this essay, therefore, globalisation specifically refers to ‘a progressive force’ which is associated with neo-liberalism that emerged since the early 1980s (Kiely, 2007: 137).
World Bank 2001a Poverty in the Age of Globalization, Washington, DC: World Bank
Davies, J.B. Et al. (2006) The world distribution of household wealth. WIDER Research Paper, 5. Dec., UNU-WIDER, New York
World Bank 1999c World Development Report 1999/2000: Entering the 21st Century, Washington, DC: World Bank
Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. (1999) Globalization in Question, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity
Sala-I-Martin, Xavier (2006) `The World Distribution of Income: Falling poeverty and... Convergence, period.` Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 121 Issue 2, p351-397
Dollar, D. and Kraay, A (2002) Spreading the wealth. Foreign Affairs 81(1): 120-33
UNDP 2001 Human Development Report: Making Technology Work for Human Development, New York: Oxford University Press and UN Development Programme
참고
Dollar, D. (2005) Globalization, poverty and inequality, In M. M. Weinstein (ed.), Globalization: What`s new? New York: Columbia University Press
우선 세계화에 대한 정이를 내리려고 시도했으며 빈국의 입장에서 세계화 찬반에 대해 논의를 했습니다.
